🔗 Share this article

Iran is willing to resume atomic negotiations with Washington on condition that it is treated with "dignity" and "respect", Tehran's top diplomat has stated.

The Iranian diplomat said exclusively dialogue was effective, and shared new appeals had originated from mediators to restart negotiations with the American leadership. He said Iran had zero unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran could not yet allow the global atomic watchdog to access attacked atomic facilities for security reasons.

Navigating a Difficult Course

The foreign minister is treading a difficult path since Iran wishes not to be seen to be proceeding from a situation of vulnerability, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had arisen more powerful in military terms and mentally from the joint assault on its enrichment centers in June.

He was talking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "an inalienable right to process nuclear material on home soil that it will perpetually retain" – the main reason of the impasse in the previous talks.

Earlier Discussions Suddenly Ended

The previous five rounds of talks between the United States and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and bitter end on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, attacked Iran's enrichment centers in a two-week conflict that concluded with Donald Trump claiming the sites had been eliminated. Following this, European countries employed their privilege to restore international penalties, but Iran asserts they have not had a substantial consequence.

Perfect Agreement Proposed

Iranian officials stated they felt they had reached a "ideal resolution" to the uranium processing matter in earlier negotiations, when it was settled an local partnership with US participation could enrich uranium. Each party would have been able to assert triumph since domestic enrichment would have remained and the US could be certain that Iran's atomic project was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been settled in the negotiations that American atomic experts could work on Iranian soil, but that was a logical implication of the consortium proposal. Diplomats stated on multiple occasions they had achieved a deal with the US representative Steve Witkoff only for the arrangement to disintegrate due to "detractors in America".

Current Situation

Iran's diplomats said the cooperative arrangement was now off the table, but it seems very probable the suggestion could be reintroduced in certain ways if discussions restart.

The American leader in recent days said he had been receiving messages that Iran desired to reopen negotiations, but in private Iran's diplomats claim they are not yet getting consistent overtures from Washington either explicitly or from key regional mediators, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Iran's state department has been criticized of non-responsiveness in the face of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Iran says dialogue is not part of a performance.

Political Stance

In his speech to the gathering, intended to portray the US as a controlling nation that abuses the notion of global regulations, the foreign minister declared the fortnight-long engagement demonstrated the conflict could not be resolved by military means. He stated the assaults began with a US demand for an complete Tehran capitulation and concluded with an unconditional call for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is assured the initial Israeli attacks were mounted with complete American awareness and coordination, making trust challenging to restore.

Negotiations Remains the Ultimate Answer

The foreign minister declared: "It was not Iran that had deserted negotiations; it was the United States and the European states that had consistently tried to impose their demands during the discussions. Diplomacy can still be viable and remains the primary resolution to address conflicts, but its requirements, guidelines and principles must be respected."

"Provided that they address to the nation of Iran with the approach of respect and honor, they will get a reply in the same language."

Restoration and Rebuilding

In what is described by Tehran representatives as the conflict of recovery and recovery, Araghchi said he was confident Iran's military capacities "have significantly improved than before 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been reestablished. We learned multiple understandings from this war; we have discovered our personal limitations and the vulnerabilities of the adversary."

He continued: "We successfully passed this war. Our atomic expertise, which they aimed to obliterate, remains in place. The facilities and machinery, if damaged, will be rebuilt; what is crucial is the will of the citizens of Tehran and then the national cohesion that they aimed at, but failed to destroy. The citizens of Tehran have become more resilient, more integrated, and more endorsing of the administration and the country in the wake of this attack."