🔗 Share this article

Via an unattributed decision, the nation's top court has allowed Texas to implement a newly configured congressional district plan that could add up to five additional Republican-leaning districts. The six-to-three order, issued on Thursday, grants a petition by the state to overturn a federal judge's ruling that had invalidated the redistricting plan in November.

Court's Explanation

The district court wrongly interjected itself into an active primary campaign, generating significant confusion and disrupting the delicate federal-state balance in elections, the justices wrote in explaining its ruling.

The federal court had determined that Texas had likely classified voters by their race – a method known as racial gerrymandering – when it enacted the new maps. It had mandated the state to employ the maps drawn after the 2020 census for the upcoming election.

Strong Opposition

With a strongly worded objection, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the majority's decision. She argued that it undermined the work of the district court, observing that its opinion was written by a judge selected by former President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan argued in a opinion co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, The majority's order ensures that Texas's new map, with all its boosted partisan advantage, will govern next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas voters, for no good reason, will be sorted in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has declared year in and year out, is a infraction of the constitution.

National Map-Drawing Battle

The ruling occurs during a national contest over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in pushes to reshape the U.S. House map to bolster a slim Republican majority. Usually, redistricting occurs after a new decade's census. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to initiate a bold off-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer triggered a wave among other states.

Conservative legislators in including North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted new maps that are estimated to yield several additional conservative seats. Democrats, for their part, have pushed back with their own plans in states like California and Virginia, which could offset those projected gains.

Political Responses

Lone Star State attorney general hailed the High Court's decision. In a statement, he said the order defended Texas's basic authority to draw a map that secures representation supportive of Republicans. Our state is leading the charge to reclaim the nation, one district and one state at a time, he added.

Conversely, Democratic officials lamented the outcome. It is deeply disheartening that the Court has endorsed this severely racially gerrymandered plan from Texas Republicans, said the leader of a major Democratic election organization.

Another top Democratic leader argued the court had yet again damaged its standing by upholding a race-based map. The ruling demonstrates a willingness to subvert democracy. This Texas plan is a partisan, racially biased scheme to undermine voter will, especially in communities of color, he concluded.